An ordinance relating to prohibiting algorithmic-based price discrimination; requiring covered retailer disclosures to consumers; requiring that covered retailers retain certain records; and adding a new Chapter 7.35 to the Seattle Municipal Code. · matter 17368
This matter became more clearly presented
ClearerThe finding met the configured count of independently supported observations after review.
The review at a glance
Page 47 keeps the decision, evidence origin, and uncertainty visible so a reader can inspect the reasoning.
What changed
Presentation dimensions stay separate so a change in one cannot cancel a change in another.
Agenda placement
No directional changeA supported agenda placement was not available for the latest pair.
Document substance
Evidence detailOnly captured document pages are used for this section.
The document states: Effect: This amendment would request that the Executive analyze the price of groceries, reward and loyalty program availability, and number of covered retailers in Seattle and report to Council on these findings on an annual basis while this ordinance is in effect.
Open Amendment H to CB 121267 – Fair Pricing and Transparency ORD · PDF page 1Reconstructed from public record2026-09-22T10:34:52.850312ZThe document states: Add a new Section 2 to CB 121267 as follows and renumber subsequent sections: Section 2. It is the Council’s intent that the Executive conduct, on an annual basis, an analysis of the price of groceries, as defined in RCW 82.84.030, sold by covered retailers, as defined in Section 7.35.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code, in the City of Seattle (City). A report on the findings of this analysis is requested to be transmitted to Council by December 31st of every year that this ordinance is in effect. The report should include information on the change in the average price of groceries in the City relative to the year prior, a comparison of the average price of groceries in the City with the average price of groceries in neighboring cities in King County such as Bellevue, Burien, Issaquah, Kirkland, Renton, and Shoreline, the availability of loyalty and/or rewards programs offered by covered retailers within the City, and the total number and geographic distribution of covered retailers within the City. The grocery price analysis should be conducted using a “basket of goods” methodology comparable to the “food at home” groceries category employed by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics in calculation of the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Open Amendment H to CB 121267 – Fair Pricing and Transparency ORD · PDF page 1Reconstructed from public record2026-09-22T10:34:52.850312Z
Document timing
Insufficient evidencePage 47 does not use ordinary last-modified values as directional evidence.
What Page 47 knows
The Council Bill (CB) was discussed in the briefing and discussion session.
The Council Bill (CB) was passed as amended by the committee.
The Council Bill (CB) has a delayed effective date of September 1, 2027.
The Council Bill (CB) includes penalties for violations, such as civil penalties of up to $3,000 per violation.
The Council Bill (CB) may be enforced by private right of action with similar penalties.
The Council Bill (CB) includes provisions for uniform discounts based on disclosed eligibility criteria.
The document states: Effect: This amendment would request that the Executive analyze the price of groceries, reward and loyalty program availability, and number of covered retailers in Seattle and report to Council on these findings on an annual basis while this ordinance is in effect.
Open Amendment H to CB 121267 – Fair Pricing and Transparency ORD · PDF page 1Reconstructed from public record2026-09-22T10:34:52.850312ZThe document states: Add a new Section 2 to CB 121267 as follows and renumber subsequent sections: Section 2. It is the Council’s intent that the Executive conduct, on an annual basis, an analysis of the price of groceries, as defined in RCW 82.84.030, sold by covered retailers, as defined in Section 7.35.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code, in the City of Seattle (City). A report on the findings of this analysis is requested to be transmitted to Council by December 31st of every year that this ordinance is in effect. The report should include information on the change in the average price of groceries in the City relative to the year prior, a comparison of the average price of groceries in the City with the average price of groceries in neighboring cities in King County such as Bellevue, Burien, Issaquah, Kirkland, Renton, and Shoreline, the availability of loyalty and/or rewards programs offered by covered retailers within the City, and the total number and geographic distribution of covered retailers within the City. The grocery price analysis should be conducted using a “basket of goods” methodology comparable to the “food at home” groceries category employed by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics in calculation of the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Open Amendment H to CB 121267 – Fair Pricing and Transparency ORD · PDF page 1Reconstructed from public record2026-09-22T10:34:52.850312ZThe Council Bill (CB) was discussed in the briefing and discussion session.
Evidence timeline
Each entry identifies the evidence position. Historical comparisons may be reconstructed; captured document pages are marked separately.
- Observed by Page 472026-09-11T23:47:09.728803Z · SHA-256 59f5db03d1f1…Open evidence ↗
- Reconstructed from public record2026-09-22T10:34:52.850312Z · PDF page 1Open evidence ↗
- Observed by Page 472026-09-22T20:30:59.434155Z · SHA-256 304bb9878f29…Open evidence ↗
Evidence review
The Skeptic reviews the branch results before publication.
No rejected interpretation was recorded for this review.
How this review was assembled
Each role has a bounded evidence view. The Skeptic can reject an attractive interpretation, but cannot add facts or links.
Archivist records appearances · Substance reads captured pages · Process reads title and placement · Skeptic accepts or rejects observations · Brief Writer returns resident questions.
What the public record normally shows
No comparable body-level context was available.
Questions worth asking
- What is the primary evidence for substance_001?
- What evidence supports substance_002?
- Are there any additional observations that could be considered?
What Page 47 cannot establish
Page 47 does not determine why these changes were made.
Page 47 reports public records. It does not determine motive, legality, or a political position.